Archive

May 17, 2011

Review: Starbucks - Red Velvet Whoopie Pie

One of Starbucks' new Petites, the Red Velvet Whoopie Pie features two small red velvet cakes discs sandwiching a cream cheese frosting filling. As with all Starbucks' Petites you can purchase one for $1.50 or two for $2.50 (unless you live in Alaska or Hawaii where it costs more).

Visually, Starbucks' Red Velvet Whoopie Pie is roughly the same size and shape as an Oreo Cakester. It tastes a lot better though.

The cake portion was moist and I could actually taste the cocoa which I often find missing in a fair bit of red velvet cakes/cupcakes.
I usually find the amount of cream cheese frosting on similar items a bit too much and too sweet and the Red Velvet Whoopie Pie was no exception. However, if you have a sweet tooth I don't think it'll bother you any.

If you're eating one of these on the go or in the office, I will point out that the squiggle of red frosting pipped on top can be a bit messy; I got a bit on my fingers even when clutching the whoopie pie from the sides. The amount of red food dye in it might leave some red color on your paws.

Starbucks Store Locator

Nutritional Info - Starbucks Red Velvet Whoopie Pie (39g)
Calories - 190 (from Fat - 90)
Fat - 11g (Saturated Fat - 5g)
Sodium - 180mg
Carbs - 21g (Sugar - 19g)
Protein - less than 1g


Sharing
is Caring



4 comments:

  1.  I have to laugh at these petites. These overweight women come in and buy them thinking "oh, these are healthy".
    News Flash: They're not healthy, they're just less UNhealthy than the other pastries.

    And they may only be 200 calories, but 11 grams of fat and 5 grams of saturated fat is a lot for such a small treat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In my pre-self-imposed famine era I noticed the increasing use of Cool-Whip style/type of frosting upon cakes and various confections and noted the "lighternessicity" of he stuff when compared to the cake etc. frosting that was a commonality during my younger pre-old-disgruntled-coot era of the 1960s, 70s, 80s and...............

    it was mostly the later 1980s and increasingly, over time, that the sugar-drenched disgustingly over-sweet icing slathered atop a veritable horde of confections  was steadily replaced by the much-preferable-to-me Cool-Whip style "icing" holding much less sugar ( I believe) due to taste alone.

    I have engaged in mutual guttural grunts with others who mentioned the same observations and who agreed in various ways with me regarding the glee felt that the sugar-drenched ultra-high-calorie way-too-sweet icing/topping/etc stuff was steadily falling to the wayside akin to a ChiCom peasant-soldier following Mao's directive to advance towards Chosin Reservoir battling horrendous sub-zero ambient temperatures and accompanying nearly-incomprehensible wind-chill factors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Portion control is often problematic for the slender-challenged.

    200 calories times 10 is at least 2K calories but surely different if thinking metrically or at an avoirdupois-like level.

    Toss in a few Oreos and 3/4-gallon of ice cream and multiply times a decade and yet another tons-of-fun laments where all the decent guys are.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If a Red Velvet cake doesn't taste very chocolate someone is cheating you. A good Red Velvet is the best Devil's food cake ever dyed red.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting. If it helps any, you don't need to type a URL to leave a name.